I will write top quality content upto 400 words for 5 dollars

(2)
write top quality content upto 400 words for 5 dollars
write top quality content upto 400 words for 5 dollars
write top quality content upto 400 words for 5 dollars
write top quality content upto 400 words for 5 dollars

Compare Packages

  $5 $10 $20
 

Basic

Standard

Premium

Description Intro Writing Technical Writing Professional Writing
  I will Write Basic non plagiarized content for you. I will Write technical non plagiarized content for you. I will Write technical non plagiarized and professional content for you for blogs and weekly papers.
Commercial Use
Commercial Use is the use of a delivery for any business related use intended for profit.
Topic Research
Seller will provide additional in-depth online research into the chosen topic.
Revisions
The number of tweaks the seller includes.
1 1 1
Delivery Time
Enter Word Count:
This Package includes 400 words. For each additional 350 words, the price is $5.
This Package includes 800 words. For each additional 300 words, the price is $5.
This Package includes 1500 words. For each additional 650 words, the price is $10.
  Select $5 Select $10 Select $20

About This Gig

I am a technical writer.
I have been writing for essaysharks
Here is a sample of my work you can check it for plagiarism (less than 5%).
100% pure content.
This content I have written for a weekly paper.
Sample.

Implications from Misconduct of the Prosecutor

Misconduct by Prosecutors:

Federal prosecutorial misconduct is becoming a very common term these days. There are a few examples which tell us how much influence it can have on a lawsuit. In Virginia Federal Court, in 2003, a lawsuit against Jay Lentz was filed and he accused guilty of kidnapping and murdering his own wife. But Judge Lee later found that a calendar, which was earlier declared inadmissible evidence, found its way in the evidence box to jury. It was not supposed to be there. Investigations later found that it was the federal prosecutor Mr. Mellin who placed it there. It was an indicator that federal prosecutors think of them as above the law and try to determine the verdict of case themselves instead of the judge to let it decide.