I will pentest your ai built app to catch vulnerabilities before you launch
Cybersecurity Specialist Penetration Tester Web Network and Cloud Security
About this Gig
Your app was built fast most of the code came from AI, and it works. What you don't know yet is what's underneath.
AI-generated code ships functional, not secure: no lockout on auth, no ownership checks on API routes, no input validation on integrations. It passes every click-through test, because "it works" was the only bar it had to clear. Find out from a user after launch, or from me before you ship.
I pentest your AI-built app against the OWASP Top 10, mapped to how AI-generated code tends to fail: missing auth on late-added routes, secrets in generated config, IDOR from trusted client IDs. You get a prioritized, fix-ready report not just a scan output.
Every case is confidential your code is never uploaded to public scanners or third-party tools. I only work on authorized apps: your product, a cleared client engagement, or an academic/lab build.
What you'll get:
- A clear answer on your app's real security posture before launch
- Vulnerabilities mapped to OWASP Top 10, explained in plain language
- Practical, prioritized fixes not just a findings list
- A clean report you can act on or hand to your dev team
Send me your app before launch day, not after a user finds the gap for you.
Device:
Desktop
•
Laptop
•
Mobile
•
Tablet
Operating system:
Windows
•
Linux
•
IOS
•
Android
•
Other
My Portfolio
FAQ
Will you just run an automated scanner on my app?
No. I manually test your app against the OWASP Top 10, mapped specifically to how AI-generated code fails — the gaps automated scanners routinely miss, like broken ownership logic and auth added inconsistently across a build.
My app was built by AI — isn't it already following best practices?
No. AI optimizes for "it works," not "it's secure." Working auth doesn't mean rate-limited auth. A working API route doesn't mean it checks who's calling it. Functional and secure are different bars.
What's the difference between this and a code review?
A code review checks code quality and style. I test whether your app can actually be exploited — access control bypassed, data leaked, endpoints abused. Different question, different method.
Will you fix the vulnerabilities for me?
I deliver a prioritized, fix-ready report with exact steps — not implementation. If you want hands-on remediation help, message me before ordering and we can scope that separately.
Does this work for apps built with any AI tool — Cursor, Bolt, v0, Replit, ChatGPT?
Yes. The failure patterns I test for come from how AI generates code, not which specific tool you used — so this applies regardless of your build stack.
Do you need my full source code?
For the most thorough review, yes — read access to your repo. If you'd rather I test the live app only, that's possible too, but source access finds more.
Does this cover mobile or desktop apps?
This gig is scoped to web apps and web-based tools. If your app is mobile or desktop-native, message me first — I may still be able to help, but the approach differs.
Is my code and data kept confidential?
Yes. Your code is never uploaded to public tools or shared outside this engagement. Everything stays between us.
What if you don't find any vulnerabilities?
You still get a full report confirming what was tested and what held up — a clean result is a real deliverable, not a refund trigger.
How fast can you turn this around?
Basic delivers in 1 day, Standard in 3, Premium in 5 — see package details for exact scope at each tier.
