I will audit your ai coding agent for reliability and context waste

D
dawpapdat
D
dawpapdat
David Wieczorek

About this gig

Is Codex, Claude Code, or Cursor ignoring instructions, rereading files, looping, or struggling to verify changes? I will audit your AI coding agent and repository to find the reliability bottlenecks behind wasted context and inconsistent output.


You receive an evidence-backed report covering:

conflicting or duplicated instructions

context waste and repeated work

tool, memory, and workflow risks

missing tests and weak verification

high-impact fixes in priority order


Basic: repo scan + prioritized findings.

Standard: full instruction/context/tool/test audit.

Premium: full audit plus bounded fixes, regression tests, and verification.


Send a repository or project export, the agent instructions, the problem you are seeing, and your expected behavior. Never send passwords, API keys, private tokens, or secrets. I work with Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, and similar AI coding workflows. Scope is one repository or project per package; large multi-repo migrations require a custom offer.

Get to know David Wieczorek

David Wieczorek

Freelancer

  • FromSweden
  • Member sinceJun 2020
  • Avg. response time1 hour
  • Languages

    Swedish, English
I help founders and small teams diagnose unreliable AI-built software. I work with Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, Replit, and similar tools. I audit repositories and applications for conflicting instructions, context waste, repeated work, missing tests, weak verification, broken workflows, and production-readiness risks. You receive a clear, evidence-backed report explaining what is wrong, why it matters, and what to fix first. I separate measured facts from recommendations and unknowns. I can also implement bounded fixes, create reliability tests, and verify the results.

Other AI Development Services I Offer