I will write a complete unit testing suite for your codebase, mutation tested
Solutions Architect for AI Agents and Data Integration
About this Gig
Most test suites prove the code runs. They do not prove it is right. I write tests that fail when the behaviour breaks, which is a different and harder thing.
Premium includes a mutation testing report: I deliberately break your code in hundreds of small ways and show you which breaks your tests caught and which slipped through. That tells you something a coverage percentage cannot. You can have 90% coverage and tests that would not notice a bug.
I run agent swarms to generate and check these, so you get a full suite in days rather than weeks, and the mutation report is the evidence it is worth having.
Eight years of backend and data engineering at an enterprise data company, where I resolved 107 production incidents, 34 of them at P1 or P2, with none left open. Every fix shipped with a test that failed before it and passed after.
Java, TypeScript, Python. You get the suite, a CI config to run it, and a short note on what is covered and what deliberately is not.
Tell me your language and roughly how big the codebase is, and I will tell you honestly what is worth testing first.
Testing platform:
Software testing
Device:
PC
•
Mac
•
Linux
My Portfolio
FAQ
What is mutation testing and why is it only in Premium?
I break your code deliberately, in hundreds of small ways, and report which breaks your tests caught and which slipped through. Coverage tells you a line ran. This tells you a test would notice if it was wrong. It takes longer to run and read, so it sits in Premium.
My codebase has no tests at all. Is that a problem?
It is the normal starting point, and it is easier than a half-tested codebase because there is nothing misleading to unpick. Send the repo and tell me what has broken in production before. That is where the first tests should go, not wherever coverage happens to be lowest.

