I will draw a publication ready forest plot or prisma diagram from your data


About this gig
Your forest plot is the figure reviewers look at first. Wrong confidence intervals, or axis labels that do not match the text, make the paper read as careless before anyone reaches the discussion.
I build the figure from numbers you already have. No analysis, no guessing.
WHAT YOU GET
- Forest plots with effect sizes, 95% confidence intervals and weights, ordered the way your journal wants
- PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams from your screening counts, every exclusion reason named
- CONSORT, STROBE and study-design schematics
- Vector PDF and SVG, plus 300 or 600 dpi TIFF
- Editable source file, so one changed number after a revision does not mean paying twice
- A spec sheet: figure width, fonts, line weights, colour values
WHAT I NEED
Your extracted data table, or your counts at each screening stage. Journal figure guidelines if you have them; if not I will find the current version and say which I used.
WHAT I DO NOT DO
I do not run the meta-analysis, I do not estimate a missing number, and I do not redraw a figure to flatter a result. If a value is missing I stop and tell you which one.
Everything goes through the requirements form. I confirm feasibility before the clock starts.
Get to know Lik Kwan
Clinical Psychiatrist
- FromChina
- Member sinceOct 2026
Languages
Chinese, English
FAQ
Do you run the meta-analysis for me?
No. I plot the numbers you already have: effect sizes, confidence intervals and weights from your extracted data. If you also need the analysis run, that is a different job, and I would rather say so than improvise statistics.
What do you need from me to start?
Your data table: study labels, effect size, lower and upper confidence interval, weight if you have it. For a PRISMA diagram, the counts at each stage plus why records were excluded. A screenshot of the journal guidelines helps but is optional.
What file formats will I get?
Vector PDF and SVG, plus TIFF or PNG at 300 dpi, or 600 dpi on the four-figure package. Fonts are embedded and text stays editable in the source file, so production does not have to redraw anything.
Can you guarantee the journal will accept my figure?
No. Acceptance depends on the science. What I can do is meet the journal's stated figure requirements: size, resolution, fonts, line weights, colour mode. I check against the guideline version I used and tell you which one.
What if a number in my table is missing?
I stop and tell you which cell. I never fill a gap with a plausible value. You either send the real number, or we drop that row and note why in the legend.
My numbers change after revision. Do I pay twice?
On the same figure, no. You get the editable source file, so a changed value is a small edit. Send the new number and I return the updated figure inside the revision round.
Can you match my target journal's exact specifications?
Yes, that is the part I care about. Send the guidelines or the journal name and I find the current version: column width, minimum font size, dpi, colour mode, file type. If two versions conflict, I say which one I followed.
Is my data confidential?
Used for this order only. Not for training, not for examples, not shared. Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, or on request, and I confirm the deletion in writing.
Do you use AI tools?
Yes, for the mechanical parts: reading your table, drawing axes, checking that the counts add up. Every figure is reviewed by me before delivery, and I can state which tools ran if your journal asks for an AI-use statement.

