Browse categories
Explore
Fiverr Pro
English
$
USD
Luz Portwood
@luz_writer1
Book Editing, Ghostwriting, Ebook writing, Developmental Edit and Proofreading
United States
English, Spanish, French
About me
I’m Luz, a professional writer and editor with extensive experience across multiple genres and industries. Over the past nine years, I’ve worked on more than 300 novels, delivering high quality writing and editing Customized to each client’s vision. I take pride in producing polished, engaging work and treating every project as an opportunity to grow and refine my skills. If you’re seeking a dedicated, passionate professional to bring your ideas to life, I’d be delighted to collaborate with you.
Skills
Luz Portwood
Offline •
Average response time: 2 hours
See my services
Beta Reading
I will christian beta reader fantasy beta reader ya fiction beta reader book critique
Formatting
I will do print book formatting, novel formatting, fiction formatting
3 Reviews
| (1) | ||
| (0) | ||
| (1) | ||
| (1) | ||
| (0) |
Rating Breakdown
- Seller communication level
- Quality of delivery
- Value of delivery
1-3 out of 3 Reviews
Sort By
Most relevant
brandymarks07
United States
Ongoing collaboration
Working with Luz on my novel, Blood of Starlight, was one of the best decisions I made during the editing process. Her beta reader report was exceptionally thorough and insightful. Rather than offering only general impressions, she carefully evaluated each chapter’s characters, relationships, worldbuilding,...
Seller's Response
Helpful?
brandymarks07
United States
Ongoing collaboration
Her beta read was excellent and provided helpful insight. Unfortunately, the copyediting and proofreading did not meet a professional standard. We had agreed on a total price of $500 for my approximately 85,000-word manuscript, and I understood that this price included both copyediting and proofreading....
Seller's Response
Helpful?
brandymarks07
United States
Ongoing collaboration
I thank the freelancer for the additional work she put into Parts 1 and 2. The revised approach was substantially better and much closer to what I originally expected. However, I still found missing spaces, unresolved grammar and wording problems, and visible editing artifacts. Therefore, I cannot consider...
Helpful?
