I will screen abstracts for systematic review and meta analysis
Data Entry Biostatistics and MetaAnalysis Expert in R and RevMan
About this Gig
Are you overwhelmed by thousands of search results for your systematic review? As a medical researcher with a strong background in Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Medicine, I provide professional, high-quality title and abstract screening to help you reach your full-text review stage faster.
I specialize in clinical, healthcare, and life sciences research, ensuring your screening process follows strict PRISMA guidelines.
What I Offer:
- Dual Screening: Acting as your independent second screener to minimize bias.
- PICO Framework: Precise application of your Inclusion/Exclusion criteria.
- Duplicate Removal: Cleaning your library for a streamlined workflow.
- Software Proficiency: Experience with Rayyan, Covidence, EndNote, and Excel.
- Detailed Reporting: A clear list of excluded studies with reasons for exclusion.
Why Choose My Service?
- Medical Expertise: Final-year MBBS student with a deep understanding of clinical terminology.
- Proven Track Record: Two-time research project award winner.
- Methodological Rigor: Skilled in R for data analysis and systematic workflows.
Please message me before ordering so we can discuss your specific criteria and the size of your dataset!
Service type:
Research
Language:
English
Delivery style preference
Please inform the freelancer of any preferences or concerns regarding the use of AI tools in the completion and/or delivery of your order.
Academic work to be done for you, is unethical since it violates most schools’ Honor Codes.
Asking sellers to prepare homework/academic works on your behalf is against Fiverr’s Community Standard and may lead to your account being disabled.
My Portfolio
FAQ
Do you use AI or manual screening?
I perform 100% manual screening. While I am proficient with AI-assisted tools like Rayyan or Covidence to speed up the workflow, every "Include" or "Exclude" decision is made by me personally based on your specific PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) criteria to ensure no relevant s
Can you act as an independent second screener?
Absolutely. Most high-impact journals require two independent reviewers to minimize bias. I can work blindly on your preferred platform (Covidence, Rayyan, etc.) and we can resolve conflicts together after the screening phase is complete.
What do you need from me to get started?
I will need your Inclusion and Exclusion criteria (ideally in a PICO format) and your exported library file (RIS, BibTeX, or Excel)
How do you handle "Unsure" or "Maybe" abstracts?
In systematic reviews, the gold standard is "when in doubt, keep it in." I will mark ambiguous abstracts as "Potential Includes" for full-text review, ensuring we don't prematurely exclude a study that might meet your criteria upon closer inspection.
