Browse categories
Explore
Fiverr Pro
English
$
USD
I will audit and fix your ai generated code from cursor, lovable, bolt, v0, or claude
Joe C
About this gig
Your app worked in the demo. Then you asked Cursor, Lovable, Replit, Bolt, v0, or Claude to change one small thing - and two other things quietly broke. Or worse: you're about to let real users sign up, or take real payments, and nobody has actually read the whole codebase, because the AI wrote all of it.
That's what this gig is for.
I read your AI-generated codebase like a person, not a linter, and tell you exactly what's wrong: secrets sitting in the repo, auth checks that don't actually check anything, errors that fail silently instead of surfacing, outdated or risky dependencies the AI happened to pick, data your client code trusts that your server should be verifying instead, and config that leaks things it shouldn't into production.
You get a written report - not a vague "looks okay" - with every finding rated by severity, the exact file and line, a plain-English explanation of the actual risk, and the order to fix things in. Then a short call to walk through it.
What this is NOT: a rewrite, a penetration test, a compliance certification, or a promise to fix everything on the spot for free. It's a scoped, honest diagnosis - read the FAQ below for exactly where the line is.
Get to know Joe C
Joe C
AI Code Audit and Vibe Coding Cleanup Specialist
- FromUnited States
- Member sinceSep 2026
Languages
English
I audit AI-generated code from Cursor, Lovable, Replit, Bolt.new, v0, and Claude Code, and tell you what's wrong before it ships: exposed secrets, auth checks that don't check anything, silent errors, risky dependencies, and data your server should verify instead of trusting the client.
I run a production AI agent handling real customer email, and "looks right" has never been enough to ship alone. Its regression suite runs 25 test cases, sampled 3 times each, with safety-critical behavior gated all-or-nothing. That's the bar I apply to your code: read like a person, prove the behavior holds.
My Portfolio
FAQ
Will you charge more mid-audit if you find a lot wrong?
No — the package price is the full price for its scope. If your repo is well beyond ~5,000 lines, you'll get a quote before I start, never a surprise after you've already paid.
Do you fix the issues too?
Standard is diagnosis only — a report, not a patch — so the audit has no incentive to pad findings to justify more billable work. Premium includes capped fix time for the Critical/High findings; anything past that is quoted separately.
What do you need from me?
Read-only repo access (or a zip) and a one-line description of the problem. No production or database credentials — the audit reads code, it doesn't touch your live system.
What stacks do you cover?
Mostly JS/TS (React, Next.js, Node) and Python backends, plus the usual companions AI tools reach for — Supabase, Firebase, Stripe, Postgres. If your stack is unusual, message me before ordering.
How is this different from just asking the AI to review its own code?
The AI that wrote the bug is a bad judge of the bug — it optimizes for "looks plausible," not for proving it's correct. This audit is a second, independent read with a checklist built for exactly the failure modes AI-generated code tends to hide.
Is this a security certification?
No — it's a builder's audit, not a formal penetration test or a compliance stamp (SOC2/HIPAA/PCI). If you need one of those, say so before ordering and I'll tell you honestly whether this is the right service.
Why should I trust the quality of your audits?
I run a production AI agent handling real customer email for a small business. "Looks right" was never enough to ship it — its regression suite runs 25 cases, each sampled 3x against the live model, and any safety-critical case fails on one bad run out of three. Same bar applies to your audit.
