Browse categories
Explore
Fiverr Pro
English
$
USD
I will independently review your ai product risks and evidence
Independent AI Product Reviewer, Evidence and Reliability
I independently review AI products, assistants and workflows. I built Sigil One and Anubis Review through years of real-world AI testing. I investigate unreliable answers, unsupported claims, instruct...
About this Gig
Before customers, partners or investors pressure-test your AI product, understand what its evidence actually supports.
I provide an independent review of one defined AI product, workflow or evidence package, organized around the decision you need to make.
The review examines claimed versus observed behavior, missing or conflicting evidence, permission boundaries, unsupported outputs and relevant failure or recovery conditions.
You receive:
- A concise decision brief
- Findings linked to source or test evidence
- What holds and what remains unresolved
- Practical corrections and recommended retests
- The review's actual coverage and limits
My portfolio includes a documented external review of Fork, an explicitly labeled internal case study, and the products I build: Sigil One and Anubis Review.
The fixed fee is $4,700 for the scope agreed before ordering. Send the object, intended decision and deadline so we can confirm fit, materials and relevant checks.
One report clarification is included. Implementation and changed-version retests are separate. This is independent review, not certification or a full security audit.
Testing application:
Software
Device:
PC
FAQ
What makes this different from ordinary QA?
I examine the gap between claimed, intended and observed AI behavior, including instruction failures, unsupported outputs, false completion and recovery. Findings connect to test evidence and practical next checks. The agreed scope determines which behaviors can be assessed.
What does the $4,700 review cover?
One defined object/version and up to three agreed questions. You receive a decision brief, claim/evidence register, check records, evidence-linked findings, practical corrections, recommended retests and coverage limits. Materials and selected checks are agreed before ordering.
Will you fix the system or retest changes?
This package delivers review findings and corrective guidance. Implementation and retesting changed software require separate scope. One revision covers clarification or report errors within the original review. Original observations remain distinguishable from corrections.
What access do you need?
An authorized test environment or reproducible materials, intended behavior and representative examples. We agree permitted actions before testing. Do not send passwords or API keys in order messages. Production changes, destructive testing and access outside the agreed scope are excluded.
Does a passing review guarantee reliability?
No. Results apply to the tested version, environment and cases. I report evidence, coverage limits and unresolved questions. This is an independent bounded review, not certification, a full security audit or a guarantee that every failure has been found.
