Browse categories
Explore
Fiverr Pro
English
$
USD
I will review your saas architecture and create a scaling roadmap
Principal AI Architect, Fractional CTO, SaaS, Tech Due Diligence
I help founders, CTOs and investors make high-stakes technical decisions before they become expensive. I review SaaS and AI/GenAI architecture, production readiness, scalability, technical debt, team ...
About this Gig
Your SaaS product has users. Now you need to know: can this architecture handle 10x the load, or will it crack? Is the technical debt manageable, or is it compounding?
I do an architecture risk scan: data model, API design, service boundaries, deployment infrastructure, and database patterns. You get a clear picture of where your architecture is strong, where it will break under growth, and what to fix first.
Every tier includes ranked scaling risk priorities - not just "what's wrong" but "what matters most." The Premium tier adds a rewrite-risk signal for teams wondering whether the current foundation holds.
I bring 25+ years in software and 15+ years as an enterprise architect. I've assessed architectures for startups, scale-ups, and enterprise transformation programs.
This is a risk scan, not a production-readiness review or decision sprint. I review your codebase and flag risks. No stakeholder interviews, no formal scorecard, no executive readout. For those, message me directly.
System type:
Software
FAQ
How is this different from a code review?
A code review focuses on code quality - bugs, security issues, test coverage, code patterns. This focuses on architecture - system design, data model, service boundaries, scaling characteristics, and deployment patterns. I look at the forest, not the trees.
What's the difference between Basic and Standard?
Basic gives you the top 3 risks and whether your architecture can handle growth. Standard covers more ground and includes ranked scaling risk priorities.
When should I choose Premium?
When your team is wondering "can we keep building on this?" Premium covers the broadest scope and includes a rewrite-risk signal - a clear indication of whether the current architecture holds or needs a different approach. For a full fix-vs-rewrite decision framework with cost modelling, message me
What tech stacks do you cover?
Any web/SaaS stack. Most common: React/Next.js + Node.js/Python backends, PostgreSQL/MongoDB databases, AWS/GCP/Vercel/Netlify deployment. I've reviewed monoliths, microservices, serverless, and hybrid architectures.
Can you review a system built by an agency or outsourced team?
Yes. This is a common scenario - a CTO inherits or takes over a codebase built by a team that's no longer involved. The review helps you understand what you have before deciding what to do next.
Do you need code access?
Yes, read-only. Plus any architecture diagrams, deployment configs, and database schemas you have. Mutual NDA signed before access.
What if the recommendation is "rewrite"?
You get an honest signal. If the architecture shows rewrite-level risk, I'll say so. For a full decision framework with cost and timeline modelling for each path, message me directly.
What's out of scope?
Implementation, load testing, penetration testing, compliance certification, database performance tuning, stakeholder interviews, formal scorecards, executive readouts, and fix-vs-rewrite decision frameworks. This is a risk scan with ranked priorities.
