I will implement eu ai act article 50 in your ai product


About this gig
Article 50 of the EU AI Act has applied since 2 August 2026. The Digital Omnibus did not move it only high-risk deadlines slipped to 2 Dec 2027. Fines reach 15m or 3% of global turnover. If your product chats with users, generates media or scores emotions, you are in scope today. Last transitional date here: pre-existing systems must meet Art. 50(2) machine-readable marking by 2 December 2026.
MOST SELLERS HAND YOU A PDF. I'm an AI engineer: I audit against 50(1)-(5), then ship the code that closes it.
THE FOUR DUTIES
- 50(1) disclosure that users are talking to AI, incl. attribution
- 50(2) machine-readable marking: signed C2PA metadata + imperceptible watermark, per the Code of Practice
- 50(3) emotion recognition / biometric categorisation notices
- 50(4) deepfake and public-interest text labels using official EU icons
YOU GET: a gap report mapping each system to provider or deployer role, shippable disclosure copy, a marking and detection build with tests, and an evidence pack for market surveillance. Built to the Commission's Art. 50 Guidelines (20 July 2026). Engineering, not legal advice.
Send your stack; I'll say within 24h if you're in scope.
Get to know ali shah
AI LLM Engineer RAG, Agents, LLM Ops Shopify Hydrogen
- FromPakistan
- Member sinceAug 2026
Languages
Urdu, English
My Portfolio
Other AI Development Services I Offer
FAQ
Did the Digital Omnibus postpone my deadline?
Not for transparency. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 moved high-risk Annex III duties to 2 Dec 2027 and Annex I product duties to 2 Aug 2028, but Article 50 applied as scheduled on 2 Aug 2026. The only grace period is marking for pre-existing systems, ending 2 Dec 2026.
Are you a lawyer? Is this legal advice?
No and no. I'm an AI engineer. I implement the technical obligations and produce documentation; a law firm should sign off on classification and legal positions. Many clients use my gap report as the input that makes their legal review short and cheap.
We only resell a model from an API — still in scope?
Usually yes, as a deployer or as a provider of the system you built on top. Scope depends on who places what on the market and whether you've substantially modified it. That mapping is exactly what the Basic audit produces, and it's the answer most teams need first.
Do we need both C2PA and a watermark?
The Code of Practice expects an effective, interoperable, robust and reliable machine-readable mark, and current guidance reads as two layers: provenance metadata plus an imperceptible watermark. A PDF-only seller can't build either. I implement and test both.
What does an evidence pack actually contain?
System inventory, role and applicability reasoning, technical control descriptions, test outputs proving marking and detection work, disclosure copy as shipped, plus dated records and version history you can hand a market-surveillance authority without reconstructing anything.
How fast can you ship this?
The audit is 3 days. Marking and disclosure implementation typically 1–3 weeks depending on how many output types and languages you generate. If your deadline is close, tell me up front and I'll say honestly whether to take the job.

